agents-skills-setup¶
A template for wiring an agentic coding assistant into your project. Copy one of its two self-contained bundles into your own project, customize it, and you get a complete, backend-agnostic ticket workflow plus a handful of auto-triggered authoring and review agents.
Everything in the bundles is prompt-and-config only: no runtime, no dependencies, no build step. The commands, skills, and agents are Markdown instructions your assistant loads on demand and executes with its own tools.
This site is the detailed reference — every command, skill, and review agent, with a diagram of how it actually moves through its steps and gates. For the five-minute version (copy the bundle, run init, ship your first ticket), see Getting started.
Two bundles, five assistants¶
| Assistant | Bundle | Commands look like | Config path |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | .claude/ |
/ticket:new |
.claude/config.yaml |
| OpenAI Codex | .agents/ + AGENTS.md |
$ticket-new |
.agents/config.yaml |
| Google Antigravity | .agents/ + AGENTS.md |
/ticket-new |
.agents/config.yaml |
| Gemini CLI | .agents/ + AGENTS.md |
/ticket-new |
.agents/config.yaml |
| GitHub Copilot | .agents/ + AGENTS.md |
/ticket-new |
.agents/config.yaml |
The two bundles are functionally identical, byte-for-byte-equivalence-checked
mirrors of each other (.agents/skills/ is where Codex, Antigravity, Gemini
CLI, and Copilot all discover Agent Skills; Claude Code
reads only .claude/). This site documents the workflow once — wherever a
command name differs by assistant, both forms are shown side by side. See
Platform support for the full evidence behind the split.
flowchart LR
T["agents-skills-setup<br/>(this template)"] -->|copy .claude/| C["Claude Code<br/>bundle in your repo"]
T -->|copy .agents/ + AGENTS.md| G["Codex · Antigravity · Gemini CLI · Copilot<br/>bundle in your repo"]
C --> I["/ticket:init<br/>·<br/>/ticket-init"]
G --> I
I -->|writes config.yaml,<br/>stages, research agents| R["Ready to work"]
R --> N["/ticket:new<br/>capture work"]
N --> P["/ticket:pick<br/>plan → implement → review"]
P --> V["/ticket:review<br/>verify"]
V --> CL["/ticket:close<br/>ship"]
V -.->|failed| RJ["/ticket:reject<br/>back to in-progress"]
RJ --> P
What's documented here¶
-
The seven
/ticket:*commands that take work from idea to shipped — what each one gates on, what it reads and writes, and where it can exit. -
The shared machinery every command runs on: the execution engine, the milestone-drift detector, and the standalone alignment interviewer.
-
Six read-only subagents: one derives a ticket's non-functional requirements at creation, five stress-test plans and diffs inside
/ticket:pick's implementation loop — and all work standalone too. -
The full shape of
config.yaml, and a tour of the 18 example projects that exercise every backend × milestone × inbox × project-board combination.
Design principle: agents are research, not inline reading¶
Any source that holds information should be a research agent, not inline reading. An agent reads the source in its own isolated context and returns only the distilled finding — so the main conversation stays clean and the ticket body carries conclusions, not dumps.
/ticket:init walks you through registering research agents for your
project's own sources (docs, API references, prior art, the web) — see
Getting started — which then get
dispatched automatically during /ticket:new's analysis and research steps.